<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Extracurriculars &#187; yahoo! sports</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wendyparker.org/tag/yahoo-sports/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wendyparker.org</link>
	<description>Discoveries, rants and comfort-food cravings of a sports omnivore.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 04:54:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The future of independent sports websites</title>
		<link>http://www.wendyparker.org/2012/12/the-future-of-independent-sports-websites/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wendyparker.org/2012/12/the-future-of-independent-sports-websites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 11:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wendy Parker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[sports journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nbc sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo! sports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wendyparker.org/?p=5586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TweetOn Sunday NBC Sports and Yahoo! Sports announced that they have entered into a content-sharing arrangement, the latest example of old/new media collaboration in the hotly contested sports domain.
Unlike Turner Sports&#8216; recent acquisition of Bleacher Report, this isn&#8217;t a consolidation. Nor is it a vast reorganization, as has happened at USA Today, which also acquired [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tw_button" style=""><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wendyparker.org%2F2012%2F12%2Fthe-future-of-independent-sports-websites%2F&amp;text=The%20future%20of%20independent%20sports%20websites&amp;related=&amp;lang=en&amp;count=horizontal&amp;counturl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wendyparker.org%2F2012%2F12%2Fthe-future-of-independent-sports-websites%2F" class="twitter-share-button"  style="width:55px;height:22px;background:transparent url('http://www.wendyparker.org/wp-content/plugins/wp-tweet-button/tweetn.png') no-repeat  0 0;text-align:left;text-indent:-9999px;display:block;" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/twitter.com/share?url=http_3A_2F_2Fwww.wendyparker.org_2F2012_2F12_2Fthe-future-of-independent-sports-websites_2F_amp_text=The_20future_20of_20independent_20sports_20websites_amp_related=_amp_lang=en_amp_count=horizontal_amp_counturl=http_3A_2F_2Fwww.wendyparker.org_2F2012_2F12_2Fthe-future-of-independent-sports-websites_2F&amp;referer=');">Tweet</a></div><p>On Sunday <em>NBC Sports</em> and <em>Yahoo! Sports</em> announced that they have <a href="http://www.adweek.com/news/technology/nbc-sports-and-yahoo-are-league-145831" target="_blank" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.adweek.com/news/technology/nbc-sports-and-yahoo-are-league-145831?referer=');"><strong>entered into a content-sharing arrangement</strong></a><strong>, </strong>the latest example of old/new media collaboration in the hotly contested sports domain.</p>
<p>Unlike <em>Turner Sports</em>&#8216; recent acquisition of <em>Bleacher Report</em>, this isn&#8217;t a consolidation. Nor is it a vast reorganization, as has happened at <em>USA Today</em>, which also acquired <em>The Big Lead.</em>. Both <em>NBC Sports </em> and <em>Yahoo! Sports</em> will team up on a cross-platform basis primarily for major stories and events, save the Olympics (which remains NBC&#8217;s exclusive baby).</p>
<p><em>Yahoo! Sports</em> has been jockeying with <em>ESPN.com</em> for top spot in <strong><a href="http://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/Daily/Issues/2012/10/09/Media/comscore.aspx" target="_blank" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/Daily/Issues/2012/10/09/Media/comscore.aspx?referer=');">ComScore&#8217;s sports web traffic rankings</a></strong> for some time, and this new deal is expected to yield 50 million monthly unique visitors for the new partners, the best sports numbers on the web.</p>
<p>The best quick analysis comes from Eric Fisher of the <em>Sports Business Journal</em>, who Tweeted Sunday night that &#8220;Point being, big scale, tons of content, lots of cross-platform integration all now pre-reqs to really play in this space.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;This space&#8221; is now almost entirely dominated by corporate media entities or league-run sites such as <em>NFL.com</em>. Of the Top 10 sites on the ComScore sports list, the newly expanded and revamped <em>SB Nation</em> remains as a rare independent. The addition of excellent new content, such as the daily Longform feature <a href="http://www.wendyparker.org/2012/09/the-webs-longform-sports-evolution-continues/" target="_blank"><strong>I wrote about recently</strong></a>, was done to make <em>SB Nation</em> more valuable to advertisers.</p>
<p>But what about potential suitors for a merger, or a content-sharing agreement? Last week, Brian Solomon of <em>Forbes</em> dug into <em>SB Nation</em>&#8217;s prospects, speculating that <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/briansolomon/2012/12/06/meet-the-digital-upstart-that-thinks-millions-of-rowdy-fans-are-the-future-of-the-web/" target="_blank" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.forbes.com/sites/briansolomon/2012/12/06/meet-the-digital-upstart-that-thinks-millions-of-rowdy-fans-are-the-future-of-the-web/?referer=');"><strong>it&#8217;s only now breaking even</strong></a> after spinning off from the liberal <em>Daily Kos</em> political blog network. It could be ripe for some kind of association, at the very least.</p>
<p>In just a very short order, the top corporate sports media players have strengthened their grip on the numbers and metrics that advertisers value most. Others are struggling to keep up, namely <em>Sports Illustrated</em> and <em>The Sporting News</em>, which announced today it is <a href="http://www.shermanreport.com/sporting-news-prints-final-magazine-126-years-web-site-still-continues/" target="_blank" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.shermanreport.com/sporting-news-prints-final-magazine-126-years-web-site-still-continues/?referer=');"><strong>ending its 126-year print run</strong></a> and will become digital only.</p>
<p>As a veteran of corporate media who&#8217;s spent the last eight years on the digital side, I appreciate the power of the full-service sports sites. They reel in enough revenues to subsidize the longform experiments going on at places such as <em>ESPN.com&#8217;s Grantland </em>and <em>USA Today&#8217;s Sports on Earth</em>.</p>
<p>But the obsession over reaching numbers also figures, at some point, to crowd out anything but the top traffic-driving content. With the exception of <em>ESPN.com</em>&#8217;s <em>espnW</em>, most of these sites do little with women&#8217;s sports. While soccer has grown in popularity that&#8217;s reflected on many of these sites, some of the best material produced about the sport continues to be on independent sites, including the new <em>XI Quarterly</em> and <em>American Soccer Now. </em></p>
<p>This is encouraging, but I wonder about the ability of other, and still-to-come independent sites on niche sports topics to enter the fray &#8212; on their own level, of course &#8212; and sustain themselves. If they&#8217;re successful enough on the right subjects, they might easily be swallowed up.</p>
<p>The competition to cover the NFL, college football, Major League Baseball and other dominant sports undoubtedly will be ramping up, even more fiercely than what we&#8217;re seeing now. But there is so much else about the sports world that doesn&#8217;t fit this bill, and the young male demographic desired by advertisers, that could be neglected entirely in the battle for more page views and unique visitors.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what the numbers are for <em>The Classical</em>, <a href="http://theclassical.org/articles/one-year" target="_blank" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/theclassical.org/articles/one-year?referer=');"><strong>which just celebrated its first year</strong></a> and was launched via Kickstarter with some impressive editorial ambitions. As editor David Roth writes, it&#8217;s &#8220;less business-neutered, less gymnastic in its starchy and secretly  dumb avoidance of the colloquial; it has some intimation of humanity to  it.&#8221; We need more of this quirkiness, however uneven <em>The Classical</em> has been at times, and even though it&#8217;s not a full-time job for the contributors.</p>
<p>The opportunities are there to deliver news, information and community on sports topics that are starving for attention, and have a respectable audience to reach. Like the best hyperlocal news sites, it will take some very dedicated, patient individuals to &#8220;cultivate a small field,&#8221; shunning volume for topical distinction and quality.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s becoming a greater challenge to make this work, since &#8220;scale&#8221; seems to be all the rage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wendyparker.org/2012/12/the-future-of-independent-sports-websites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
